PostDoc Discussion Forum

The following thread is brought to you by our sister Web site PostgraduateForum.com. If you wish to reply or post your own thread, you will be redirected to this site.

Search Forum Post new topic

Post reply on Postgrad Forum | Sort latest to earliest | Back to topics

Author	Message
Hany [Registered User] 07 October 2021 13:28	a question on sampling procedure User: Hany - 07 October 2021 13:28 Hi, I am going to conduct a research on teachers and students using mixed-methods involving questionnaire, observation and interview. Is there a way to choose participants from the observation? For example, if I observe a class and some students participate more than the others and I would like to interview them. What will be the best academic way to do so? What this process called? I have been searching, but could not find an answer. Thanks
abababa [Registered User] 17 October 2021 23:49	User: abababa - 17 October 2021 23:49 It's selective or purposive sampling and it's generally considered bad, in the context you're seeking to generalise, since you're 'cherry picking' the participants that will give you the most feedback but there's an inherent bias. Obviously this depends on what your fundamental research question is, if it's completely and reasonably separate from any attempt to generalise; or any attempt to ascertain the effectiveness of the teaching method/style/pedagogy, then it can be argued as valid. You may want to look at phenomenological analysis or critical realism.

Author

Message

Hany

[Registered User]
07 October 2021 13:28

a question on sampling procedure

User: Hany - 07 October 2021 13:28

Hi,

I am going to conduct a research on teachers and students using mixed-methods involving questionnaire, observation and interview. Is there a way to choose participants from the observation? For example, if I observe a class and some students participate more than the others and I would like to interview them. What will be the best academic way to do so? What this process called? I have been searching, but could not find an answer.

Thanks

abababa

[Registered User]
17 October 2021 23:49

User: abababa - 17 October 2021 23:49

It's selective or purposive sampling and it's generally considered bad, in the context you're seeking to generalise, since you're 'cherry picking' the participants that will give you the most feedback but there's an inherent bias.

Obviously this depends on what your fundamental research question is, if it's completely and reasonably separate from any attempt to generalise; or any attempt to ascertain the effectiveness of the teaching method/style/pedagogy, then it can be argued as valid. You may want to look at phenomenological analysis or critical realism.

Post reply on Postgrad Forum | Sort latest to earliest | Back to topics

Our Sites

PostDoc Search

Main Menu